MakerDAO, one of the crypto world’s oldest and largest DeFi protocols, has proposed a controversial change that would allow users to borrow its DAI stablecoin against its MKR governance token.
This proposal is part of co-founder Rune Christensen’s “Endgame” plan and is drawing comparisons to UST, another stablecoin that uses its governance token as collateral.
Summary
Rune Christensen’s proposal on how to use MKR crypto as collateral
While some members of the crypto community have expressed concern about the proposal, MakerDAO remains DeFi’s largest lending protocol, with over $6 billion in total value locked (TVL).
It allows people to mint DAI stablecoin against major crypto assets such as ETH and WBTC.
One of the main features of MakerDAO’s proposal is the use of the MKR governance token as collateral.
This token gives holders the right to vote on key protocol decisions, including changes to the stability fee (the interest rate charged on DAI loans) and the amount of collateral required to mint DAI.
The proposal would allow users to borrow DAI against their MKR tokens, effectively leveraging their voting power to increase their borrowing power.
This would create a circular system in which users borrow DAI against their MKR tokens and then use those DAI to buy more MKR tokens, thereby increasing their voting power and borrowing capacity.
This system has drawn comparisons to UST, a stablecoin that uses its LUNA governance token as collateral.
UST has become one of the most popular stablecoins in the DeFi space, with a market cap of more than $10 billion.
What does the crypto community think of it?
However, some members of the crypto community have expressed concern about MakerDAO’s proposal.
One fairly well-followed user wrote on Twitter:
“it is devastatingly disappointing to see the co-founder of Maker pushing this plan,it is as if nothing has been learned in this cycle.”
Others pointed out that MakerDAO’s proposal could create a conflict of interest, as MKR holders would be incentivized to raise the stability fee to increase the value of their collateral.
Despite these concerns, MakerDAO’s proposal has received support from some members of the cryptocurrency community.
They argue that it could help stabilize the price of MKR, which has been volatile in recent months.
The members of the DAO also point out that the proposal is still in the early stages of development and that many details have yet to be worked out.
One potential benefit of the proposal is that it could help increase the liquidity of MKR by making it easier for users to buy and sell the token.
This could help increase the overall adoption of MakerDAO and DeFi more generally.
The goals of MakerDAO’s “Endgame” plan
The proposal is also part of Rune Christensen’s controversial “Endgame” plan, which aims to create a self-sustaining DeFi ecosystem that is less dependent on outside institutions.
The plan has drawn criticism from some members of the cryptocurrency community, who argue that it is too focused on short-term gains and risks alienating key stakeholders in the long run.
Despite these concerns, MakerDAO continues to pursue its proposal.
It has announced plans to launch a new governance module that will allow users to vote on the proposal in the coming weeks.
The proposal is just one of many changes MakerDAO plans to make in the near future. The platform is also working on a number of other initiatives, including integrating its stablecoin into other DeFi protocols and developing new lending products.
As DeFi’s largest lending protocol, MakerDAO has a significant role to play in developing the ecosystem. The proposed changes will likely have a significant impact on the future of DeFi and the broader cryptographic community.
However, as with any new proposal, it is important to carefully consider the potential risks and benefits before making any decisions.
While on the one hand MakerDAO’s proposal has the potential to increase the liquidity and adoption of MKR, it also raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest and the long-term sustainability of the DeFi ecosystem.
In conclusion, the success of MakerDAO’s proposal will depend on its ability to address these concerns and gain the support of key stakeholders in the crypto community.
If it succeeds, it could help pave the way for a more decentralized and self-sustaining DeFi ecosystem in the years to come.
It is worth noting that the DeFi space is still relatively new and many of the risks and challenges associated with these protocols are still being discovered.
Therefore, it is important for users and investors to remain vigilant and carefully consider any proposals or changes to existing protocols.
