HomeCryptoAltcoinDebate on the usefulness of Cardano (ADA): Hoskinson vs. K33 Research

Debate on the usefulness of Cardano (ADA): Hoskinson vs. K33 Research

In the face of the recent scrutiny by K33 Research, the founder of Cardano (ADA), Charles Hoskinson, vigorously defends himself against the accusations of perceived “uselessness” of the crypto.

As the cryptocurrency landscape evolves, this article delves into a critical analysis, examining the contrasting perspectives on the utility of Cardano and its potential impact on the future of the network.

Charles Hoskinson challenges critics: denies claims of Cardano’s (ADA) uselessness

Charles Hoskinson, the visionary founder of Cardano, recently faced scrutiny from K33 Research, a company that criticizes Cardano’s native token, ADA.

The research has stated that ADA does not have substantial utility, sparking a debate on the future profitability of the network.

K33 Research argues that, in order for the native token of a smart contract network to have value, it must demonstrate significant usage. 

However, the company argues that ADA falls short in this aspect, citing the lack of evidence of its use beyond exchange transfers. Analysts have also raised concerns about potential artificial activities by holders, casting doubt on the authenticity of ADA’s market dynamics.

A focal point of criticism is the limited presence of Cardano in the stablecoin market. Unlike other networks where stablecoins dominate investments in DeFi altcoins, Cardano would only have 20 million stablecoins collateralized by Cardano and valued at less than one dollar. 

This apparent scarcity of significant decentralized finance (DeFi) activity raises doubts about the network’s competitive position.

The criticisms made by K33 Research

K33 Research argues that the Cardano network is characterized by exchange transfers and a group of holders who create blockchain activities. 

Analysts highlight the absence of renowned stable coins like USDT or USDC within the Cardano network. Analysts draw a parallel with other blockchain projects, such as IOTA, NEO, and EOS, which, despite initial enthusiasm, have become irrelevant due to a lack of evolutionary growth.

In response to these statements, Charles Hoskinson took a dismissive stance, questioning the credibility of K33 Research with a simple “Who? Never heard of them.”

This response, while avoiding a direct refutation of the specific points raised by the research company, raises concerns about Cardano’s ability to address valid criticisms.

The dismissal of Hoskinson indicates a lack of recognition or willingness to engage in a substantive discussion regarding the concerns highlighted by K33 Research. 

The absence of a detailed counter-argument raises doubts about Cardano’s commitment to transparency and its ability to address potential shortcomings.

The criticism from K33 Research implies that successful blockchains should grow organically from real-world use, emphasizing the importance of practical utility over grand ideas and subsidized bootstrapping. 

Cardano’s response, or lack thereof, leaves room for speculation about the future trajectory of the network and its ability to adapt to the evolving demands of the market.


In conclusion, the clash between Charles Hoskinson and K33 Research encapsulates the broader discussion about Cardano’s position in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. 

On one hand, the founder’s dismissive response can be a sign of confidence, but on the other hand, it leaves some questions open about Cardano’s adaptability and its ability to respond to valid criticisms. 

The debate highlights the tension between ambitious blockchain projects and the need for tangible utility to support long-term relevance.

At the moment when Cardano faces this scrutiny, its trajectory depends on the ability to address the concerns raised by industry analysts and promote organic growth based on real-world usage. 

The ability of the network to overcome the criticisms raised by K33 Research will likely determine its resilience in a competitive market. 

While stakeholders await developments, Cardano’s evolving narrative is an interesting case study on the intricate dynamics between visionaries, critics, and evolving expectations in the ever-changing landscape of crypto and blockchain technology.