banner
Crypto growth could create new vulnerabilities in the IMF
Crypto growth could create new vulnerabilities in the IMF
Blockchain

Crypto growth could create new vulnerabilities in the IMF

By Adrian Zmudzinski - 15 Oct 2018

Chevron down
Listen this article
download

While many may argue that the cryptocurrency market has violently crashed this year the industry is actually under heavy development.

The adoption is increasing, the institutional acceptation is improving, and the overall value of cryptocurrencies is growing even while the market cap inflated by speculation is dropping violently.

Still  — while under heavy development — the cryptocurrency space isn’t mature yet. Security continues to be a problem with only a handful of cryptos being battle tested enough to be considered safe and hacks continuing to happen.

Moreover, on-chain security isn’t a problem significant nearly as much as the reliance on vulnerable centralized systems that sacrifice the security granted by decentralization. In the future, a switch to decentralized exchanges could — and probably will — alleviate the issue and help render the ecosystem safer and more reliable.

The vulnerabilities shown by the cryptocurrency space seems to be the reason why the IMF isn’t enthusiastic about their continued growth. In a recently released report titled “World Economic Outlook: Challenges to Steady Growth,” the institution declares:

“Cybersecurity breaches and cyber attacks on critical financial infrastructure represent an additional source of risk because they could undermine cross-border payment systems and disrupt the flow of goods and services. The continued rapid growth of crypto assets could create new vulnerabilities in the international financial system.”

Bottom line

Many in the crypto community may dismiss this paragraph of the report as plain wrong, but that’s probably not correct. The current reliance of the industry on centralized mediators strips cryptocurrencies of most of their security advantages of the blockchain while introducing the inability to prevent or reverse a fraudulent transaction like a scam or a theft and a single point of failure.

Using a decentralized system employing centralized intermediaries is simply a bad idea security-wise. The solution is the development of decentralized solutions, and significant progress is being made on this front.

Decentralized exchanges are arguably becoming a viable alternative thanks to the development of atomic swaps and the absence of fees on some. Their main issue is way lower volumes. A good example is the Stellar DEX which can boast fast transactions without fees. The user of this exchange only needs to pay the transaction fee which means that with 1$ it is possible to pay the price of hundreds of thousands of trades.

Progress on the plasma protocol and the Omisego project can only further improve the situation. Such systems — after the further adoption is obtained — are expected to register higher volumes making those solutions more viable. Those will, in turn, improve the overall ecosystem security and stability.

Progress has also been made on the stable coin front. MakerDAO has released DAI, a coin tethered to the USD value through a system of market incentives. The only part of the system that may be deemed not wholly trustless are the oracles, but there is a DAO vote system that can rollback in case of collusion.

The underlying conflict

The safety issues of the major cryptocurrencies aren’t a propriety of cryptocurrencies themselves but a result of the incompatibility of the new trustless and decentralized system with the legacy finance. Once the transition to decentralized systems is completed the safety will experience a vast improvement.

Adrian Zmudzinski
Adrian Zmudzinski

Adrian is passionate about technology and Information Technology (IT). Adrian specialized in the analysis of tokens, the blockchain technology, and cryptocurrencies. His interest in Bitcoin dates back to 2009 and it rapidly transformed into a more general interest of the still arising cryptocurrency industry. His analyses are concerned mostly by the technological potential underlying the analyzed token.

We use cookies to make sure you can have the best experience on our site. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.